What actually matters is how a team performs against fellow conference members. As is the case every year, the CAA will come down to the conference tournament. Keep in mind that the CAA is a one-bid conference — meaning, whichever team wins the conference tournament in March will (most likely) be the only team that makes it to the NCAA Tournament. And the only way for W&M to position itself for a top seed in the conference tournament is to perform well against CAA teams during the regular season. It’s win or bust for your William & Mary Tribe. And with that in mind, let’s preview this year’s CAA teams.
CAA Preseason Rankings
Going into the season, it’s safe to say that Charleston, Towson, and Elon were thought to be the top teams in the CAA. And up to this point in the season, it’s too early to tell whether or not that is the case. But they’ve all come out firing, each sporting a record of 8-5 or better. In fact, of the 10 teams in the CAA, over half currently hold winning records (6 teams). With that in mind, it’ll likely be another barn burner of a season — one likely full of parity, upsets, and the occasional blowout.
Now, we mentioned that several teams hold winning records. Let’s take a look at the CAA rankings as they stand today.
Charleston, returning all five starters this season while also being picked to finish #1 in the CAA, has the same story as Towson: no signature wins, with losses to good teams such as #6 Wichita State and the A-10’s Rhode Island. But they have a roster that is stacked from top to bottom, including CAA Preseason Player of the Year, Joe Chealey. Towson and Charleston actually play each other on December 30, so we’ll know very early which team has the edge to start the season.
Current CAA Statistical Leaders
W&M players rank across the board in several important statistical categories. Having suffered multiple transfers this past offseason (Greg Malinowski and Jack Whitman), many left this team for dead. However, with a great coach and resurgent squad that doesn’t quit (and can really shoot the ball), the Tribe has gotten off to a stellar start — much better than most Tribe fans could ever hope for in the offseason. Don’t believe us? Check the numbers.
CAA Scoring
- Justin Wright-Foreman, Hofstra – 23.2 PPG
- Stuckey Mosley, JMU – 19.8 PPG
- Tramaine Isabel, Drexel – 19.5 PPG
- Nathan Knight, W&M – 18.7 PPG
CAA Rebounding
- Devontae Cacok, UNCW – 12.5 Avg/G
- Rokas Gustys, Hofstra – 10.5 Avg/G
- Justin Pierce, W&M – 9.2 Avg/G

CAA Assists
- David Cohn, W&M – 7.2 Avg/G
- Jordon Talley, UNCW – 6.0 Avg/G
- Joe Chealey, CofC – 4.6 Avg/G
CAA 3-Point FG Made
- Connor Burchfield, W&M – 38 (3.5 Avg/G)
- Matt Milon, W&M – 36 (3.3 Avg/G)
- Justin Wright-Foreman, Hofstra – 37 (3.1 Avg/G)
And in addition to spectacular play from individual players, the Green and Gold currently ranks as the best in the CAA in several team categories. And while these numbers will surely change once CAA play roles around, when was the last time your W&M Tribe ranked #1 in eight statistical categories? Roll Damn Tribe.
- Scoring Offense (#1) – 87.0 PPG
- Free Throw % (#1) – .801
- Field Goal % (#1) – .515
- 3-point % (#1) – .459
- Blocked Shots (#1) – 5.3 Avg/G
- Assists (#1) – 19.0 Avg/G
- Assist/Turnover Ratio (#1) – 1.5
- 3-Point FG Made (#1) – 12.2 Avg/G
With the out of conference slate over, we’re excited to see what this W&M squad can do against teams in its own conference. There will undoubtedly be games where the Green and Gold comes out firing, taking down big-time teams with hot shooting. However, there may also be games where W&M is cold, losing to teams it certainly should not lose to. Either way, there is much more hope than there was a couple months ago going into the season, and we’ll be rooting on the Green and Gold all the way to the very end (hopefully we’ll be dancin’). Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Tribe Fans! LET’S GO TRIBE!!!